<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Sociosophy - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-6a6caa12" type="application/json"/><link>http://sociosophy.disqus.com/</link><description>Awesome Social Media Reviews</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:05:12 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Laughing Squid</title><link>http://www.sociosophy.com/blog/2007/10/laughing-squid/#comment-16722372</link><description>Interesting post. I have stumbled and twittered this for my friends. Hope others find it as interesting as I did.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:05:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: psd2css Online</title><link>http://www.sociosophy.com/blog/2008/11/psd2css-online/#comment-15447238</link><description>PSD2CSS Online is a San Diego based company. Their service takes your PSD file and creates a nicely tuned CSS awesome, based on your design – like magic!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Club Penguin Cheats</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:17:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter - Deleting Direct Messages</title><link>http://www.sociosophy.com/blog/2008/11/twitter-deleting-direct-messages/#comment-15447199</link><description>The blog typically covers the ins-and-outs of tech-life in the trenches and often features some pretty slick snippets.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Club Penguin Cheats</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:16:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Disqus</title><link>http://www.sociosophy.com/blog/2008/05/disqus/#comment-15446991</link><description>I have three quite large blogs its an absolute godsend for me because I can control the comments from all three in one central location... awesomeness!!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Club Penguin Cheats</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:08:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yauba</title><link>http://www.sociosophy.com/2009/04/yauba/#comment-10666460</link><description>Tried it, but it didn't impress me much</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">liv</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 16:11:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ning - WTF</title><link>http://www.sociosophy.com/2009/03/ning-wtf/#comment-9858750</link><description>I totally agree that if @Ning wants to make us her sub networks or goup-looking kind of networks, they should promote our individual networks the way YouTube does it, instead of the search box for the networks you want.  And on the Ning main page, it's only promoting 1 or 2 networks at a time.  I see favoritisms that way, which isn't appealing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RON08</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 13:31:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Name is E</title><link>http://www.sociosophy.com/2009/05/my-name-is-e/#comment-9061904</link><description>&lt;a href="http://www.mynameise.com/nrek" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.mynameise.com/nrek&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nrek</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 12:57:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Disqus</title><link>http://www.sociosophy.com/blog/2008/05/disqus/#comment-8978990</link><description>Disqus, in my opinion is the future of commenting.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mesotheliomapatient</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 07:37:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clipta</title><link>http://www.sociosophy.com/2009/04/clipta/#comment-8588322</link><description>Alan, thank you for your comment. Glad to hear you're not affiliated with YouTube, maybe your comments will stay useful and sensible. Anyhow, good luck on the venture! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(Social network, just say no) ;) Cheers!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nrek</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:52:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clipta</title><link>http://www.sociosophy.com/2009/04/clipta/#comment-8587868</link><description>Enrique, &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thank you for the article, and for taking the time to look at our site! To relieve your curiosity, we are not affiliated with YouTube, nor do we want to compete with them. However, we truly believe users will benefit from being able to find any video they are looking for and discover new and interesting content – all in one place. We appreciate your comments and suggestions, and again thank you for your article.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-Alan Masarsky, Clipta Video Search</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alan Masarsky</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:38:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FriendFeed vs. Facebook</title><link>http://www.sociosophy.com/2009/04/friendfeed-vs-facebook/#comment-7848118</link><description>Looking back, I remember a time when FriendFeed first arrived to the scene. Twitter was having major stability issues and everybody from people like Robert Scoble was claiming that Twitter is dead and that Friendfeed was the new player in town.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Moving to present day we see that Twitter and Facebook are more popular than ever and Friendfeed remains in the realm of the early adopters and high level bloggers/social media purists. Why? Because Friendfeed is to hard to use while the others are simple and intuitive to use.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hope I get heat for my critiques for what I have to say about Friendfeed. Then maybe we can see these companies actually create a decent product. Guess we have to wait till Monday to see.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wizardelite</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 00:28:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FriendFeed vs. Facebook</title><link>http://www.sociosophy.com/2009/04/friendfeed-vs-facebook/#comment-7847925</link><description>Not only do I use FriendFeed to aggregate my content but I wanted to use it as a way to find interesting and relevant content from other users that share my same interests. Yet with the poor implementation of the user interface, it is an impossible task to accomplish.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Great ideas are a dime a dozen these days. What's vital is execution and if you can't successfully execute your idea it will never truly get off the ground.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I find it intriguing that shortly after this post Robert Scoble announced that FriendFeed is supposed to release a new user interface this coming Monday. I can only hope that FriendFeed realizes the key issues with their site and they make the appropriate corrections. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Expect a follow up post once I've had a chance to try out Friendfeed's redesign.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wizardelite</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 00:08:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tweetj</title><link>http://www.sociosophy.com/2009/04/tweetj/#comment-7831565</link><description>Thanks for the shout out, glad you enjoyed the site.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bsstoner</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 15:25:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Disqus</title><link>http://www.sociosophy.com/blog/2008/05/disqus/#comment-7822766</link><description>Have to say I do agree.  Things like this just are what they are.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 08:56:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Disqus</title><link>http://www.sociosophy.com/blog/2008/05/disqus/#comment-7822150</link><description>Have to say I do agree.  Things like this just are what they are.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 07:48:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Klok</title><link>http://www.sociosophy.com/2009/04/klok/#comment-7812323</link><description>Thanks for mentioning our app. We are glad you like it.&lt;br&gt;Scott&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://mcgraphix.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;mcgraphix.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scott</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 22:47:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Posty</title><link>http://www.sociosophy.com/2009/04/posty/#comment-7792920</link><description>Tumblr fail :( &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'll update the post. Love the app so far. Let me know when you address the fails ;) We'll re-review it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nrek</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 12:55:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Posty</title><link>http://www.sociosophy.com/2009/04/posty/#comment-7792788</link><description>Thanks for the review!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Fails will be taken into account during the development of the next version of Posty.&lt;br&gt;The only thing we cannot provide is the browsing of the tumblrs you are following, because&lt;br&gt;tumblr api does not provide that API at the moment.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">funkyboy</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 12:51:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FriendFeed vs. Facebook</title><link>http://www.sociosophy.com/2009/04/friendfeed-vs-facebook/#comment-7791755</link><description>I find your observations about the readability of friendfeed comments true.  The interface in Facebook is much easier to navigate.  What do use friendfeed for?  It's aggregating my activities in all the social media I've subscribed to.  But that's just about it.  At least for now.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jangeronimo</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 12:14:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FriendFeed vs. Facebook</title><link>http://www.sociosophy.com/2009/04/friendfeed-vs-facebook/#comment-7790689</link><description>FriendFeed is pretty difficult to navigate and filter. There are Lists and Rooms for seperating content, but all in all, it is way too easy to get too much info, and that kind of UI flubbing will keep FriendFeed from going mainstream. Facebook's new interface is way too darn busy, but the news feed section and left panel on the home page was a great move. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The likeness Facebook's new features has to Twitter and FriendFeed alike shows that they are apying attention at least, now if they can just unclutter the mess they have on the right of the homepage/news feed... all the better.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nrek</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 11:34:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FriendFeed vs. Facebook</title><link>http://www.sociosophy.com/2009/04/friendfeed-vs-facebook/#comment-7790370</link><description>I gave up on FriendFeed a long time ago because of the interface.  I would expect that you will receive a tremendous amount of grief for daring to say what had to be said.  The FriendFiends are quite vociferous.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Crisatunity</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 11:20:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Klok</title><link>http://www.sociosophy.com/2009/04/klok/#comment-7764604</link><description>According to Klok - this post took me 9 minutes to write &amp; proof read. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Knowing that, it's a wonder why I don't post more often. Hmmm....</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nrek</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 19:53:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Badoo</title><link>http://www.sociosophy.com/blog/2007/10/badoo/#comment-7251589</link><description>great information regarding badoo, i will certainly keep that in mind</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Badoo</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 06:51:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: adjix</title><link>http://www.sociosophy.com/2008/12/adjix/#comment-7066833</link><description>I know that spamming is wrong, but I haven't used adjix before.. and I'm a bit clueless about this topic, your definition about adjix doesn't seem enough for me.. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;or maybe I'm too 1990's and left far behind with new ones.. anyway, I'll try to research about this one..</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Traffic Geyser</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 07:56:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Disqus</title><link>http://www.sociosophy.com/blog/2008/05/disqus/#comment-6575726</link><description>Sounds great !&lt;br&gt;I think that disqus is great option for us .</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">beaandmildred</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:54:36 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>